Posts Tagged Kropotkin

Anarchism: basic concepts – Rotterdam lecture notes, more or less

Saturday, 29 October 2016

On 27 October, I did a talk in Rotterdam on ‘Anarchism: basic concepts’. It is the first talk in a series of five. A written version of the talk – not the exact words, but the braod outline of the story, and some additions – follow below.

Anarchism- Basic concepts

Introduction

Anarchism comes in as much varieties as there are and have been anarchists. Yet, we do have concepts in common, even if not all of us do use the same words. I will try to introduce what I think are the main concepts, using words as they have generally been used within the historical anarchist movement.

Anarchism is a movement of resistance. Anarchists resist the state. Anarchists resist oppression, class exploitation and the most diverse forms of domination and imposed power relations that restrict and violate our freedom as individuals. We – yes, I am one of them – want to replace all thes structures of unfreedom with a society of freedom, equality and voluntary cooperation. And we have a specific methodology opf social change, in which the end to be fought for is already visible in the means we use. Together, the critique, the goal and the road from here to there, form a recognizable whole. As historian George Woodcock formulates it:

There is a definable anarchist philosophy, just as there is a recognizable anarchist temperament. It involves three elements – a criticism of society as it is, a vision of a desirable alternative society, and a way of proceeding from one to the other.” (1)

Now, let us make vision into visions, and plan in to plans, and you have a very usable framework for presenting anarchism as a current of social and political thought and action. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , ,

7 Comments

De oude Kropotkin krijgt weer eens gelijk

vrijdag 2 augustus 2013

Evolutie, zo luidt het nog steeds veel te gangbare beeld, selecteert de sterkste concurrenten in de strijd om overleving. Het selecteert ook die  trekken, die eigenschappen die helpen om de concurrentieslag te winnen. Het is het Darwiniaanse beeld van ‘Survival of the fittest’, dat door de navolgers van Darwin, die zelf veel subtieler redeneerde, hoog wordt gehouden. Agressie, klauwen en slagtanden, benen omn hard mee te rennen, sluwheid en sl schutkleur, stekels op je weke lijf, zijn de trucs die je als dier ‘nodig’ hebt om de wedloop met rivalen en vijanden te winnen en nog een prooi te scoren ook. Concurrentie domineert het beeld. Het beeld klopt echter niet. Dat legde de anarchist Kropotkin in 1902 al uit, zijn versie krijgt ondersteuning uit de meest uiteenlopende hoek. Ook vandaag de dag. Read the rest of this entry »

,

4 Comments